![]() They are what make life worth living, or sometimes ending. No aspect of our mental life is more important to the quality and meaning of our existence than emotions. After exposing Fredrickson's concept of love, I discuss some conceptual aspects of this perspective, taking into consideration the unity of the human being and its different features in order to avoid reductionist explanations or conclusions that may lack reeection on the diierent epistemological levels of Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience. Fredrickson's provocative approach deals with love's biology, studying the biological underpinnings of love and suggesting a body's definition of love. Within contemporary psychology research, Barbara L. With the development of cognitive science and neuroscience, a lot of the current emotion research studies the biological and neurological substrates of emotions. For Aristotle, the passions of the soul or emotions are enmattered accounts (DA, aaa-). Concretely, gentleness, fear, pity, courage, joy, loving, and hating involve corporal changes, concurrent affections of the body. I hope also to shed some light into the current dialogue many scholars from both disciplines are looking for, despite the epistemological and methodological differences.Īristotle considers passions (emotions) as affections of the human soul involving a body. Secondly, I want to highlight her broader theory of human emotion integrated into the overall development of a person's life and actions, trying to uncover her intellectual work on the integration of Philosophy and Psychology perspectives. My aim is to offer first a brief view of Arnold's theory of emotion in historical perspective, placing her work and life in the context of her times. This determined the way of her contribution to interdisciplinary work and integrative view on issues like mind-brain relation, cognitive and moral aspects of emotions research. Not being a Philosopher by formation, she was influenced by the philosophical thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas, which offered her some concrete philosophical basis and critical check on her own theory. She oriented her work using phenomenological insights, thus integrating the psychological, behavioural and neurophysiological aspects on the experience of emotions. 3 In a period of increasing physiological research, she criticized reductive explanations of emotions from behaviourism and physiology. However, her voice has been silenced and her work has not been fully recognized, getting few quotations in contemporary research. Lazarus built on her theory-2 moving toward the cognitive approaches predominant nowadays. 1 With this, she put the basis of the appraisal theory of emotions-which Richard S. She coined the term 'appraisal' as the initial assessment that starts the emotional sequence and arouses both the appropriate actions and the emotional experience itself, so that the physiological changes, recognized as important, accompany, but do not initiate, the actions and experiences. Arnold (1903-2002) was one of the prominent female contributors of the mid-20th century on emotion research.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |